This should really go along with some concrete reasons/legislation that caused it all. Otherwise we're back to the same stupid pendulum swinging back and forth and when it swings left barely anything will get undone.
My Democratic Representative talking about being "proud to attend the inauguration" and "[standing] at the ready, willing to work with this administration" seems to be. I'm sure it's fine and not at all a concern and that the Democratic Party will definitely stand up for what matters, whenever they decide that is.
How is that relevant to this article? The article talks about community organizations and their use of movement ecology to improve their understanding of what they do, create cooperation and choose effective strategies. It discusses the limitations of "inside game" approaches to change and outlines how other ways can be complementary and sometimes more effective. In the light of this, why do you just focus on the limitations of the Democratic Party?