Exactly how I felt about it as it was happening, fucking stop talking about his bullshit and talk about the positives of any alternative players! We know he's bad news!
It's almost like the same people who own the mainstream media will also profit from a Trump presidency.
Wasn't it the CEO of NBC at the time who said in 2016 "Trump is bad for America but great for us"?
Trump supporters have been buying out networks and social media to support him. If they weren't for him before they are now.
Meanwhile, the Business As Usual Party has decided that their only mistake was that they didn't stick closely enough to their usual 1992 playbook.
Internal critics point to ignoring vulnerable people who weren't widely accepted as standard humans in 1992 in stead of actively vilifying them as their biggest mistake.
True to form, they then warmly welcomed their new fascist overlords in between receiving legal bribes from billionaires and their corporations to be extremely weak when negotiating for workers and generous towards said billionaires when writing legislation and regulations.
I wish we could purge this idiotic nonsense.
The media reporting on the awful outrageous things didn't elect Trump. The voters who voted for Trump elected Trump.
It's news when Trump says awful outrageous things and they should be covered more, not less.
Otherwise you end up 'obeying in advance.'
Fucking shithead morons still blaming the media instead of Trump and Trump's voters. Stop it.
This take only works if the new media is reporting on Trump accurately and factually.
The problem is that they are not. Organizations like the New York Times and the Washington Post spend most of their wordcount trying to wrangle the vile nonsense that Trump is spewing into something intelligent and legible, often by lying or misrepresenting his words. They're not reporting his atrocities, they're whitewashing them, and we should absolutely call that out as complicity.
They’re not reporting his atrocities, they’re whitewashing them, and we should absolutely call that out as complicity.
I agree with that but that's not generally the criticism leveled at the media for their coverage of Trump's awful and outrageous statements.
Basically you're saying the media should cover Trump more and more critically. OP's comic is suggesting that the media is blame for giving Trump coverage, for reacting to Trump.
Can you provide some examples of WaPo articles that did this? Everything I read that I can recall listed his statements in context and gave the actual facts.
There is too much blame to go around, and not enough people and orgs wanting to acknowledge blame.
Trump did not become a household name randomly. He was helped and aided by many. And I have noticed hundreds of times how the main stream media enabled his word salad and gave it meaning and power. In real life, not many people listen to blathering hateful idiots.
