You're viewing a single thread.
All Comments
37 comments
Interesting to see how many features NTFS does support
28 0 ReplyThat’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS.
Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
17 0 ReplyNot sure if it's gotten better in the last few years, but it's also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
7 0 ReplyI’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
4 0 ReplyOops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
11 0 ReplyYeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.
1 0 Reply
37 comments
Scroll to top