Why can't I ping some websites?
Why can't I ping some websites?
Hello! I'm trying to ping
some lemmy instances to understand which one is the faster, so I'm just using the ping command:
$ ping lemmy.ml
PING lemmy.ml (54.36.178.108) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from lemmy.ml (54.36.178.108): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=24.4 ms
ping lemmy.world
PING lemmy.world (135.181.143.230) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from static.230.143.181.135.clients.your-server.de (135.181.143.230): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=58.2 ms
but if I try with certain instances:
ping vlemmy.net
PING vlemmy.net (109.78.160.70) 56(84) bytes of data.
it just hangs there, forever. if I try to ctrl+C it, it displays
^C
--- vlemmy.net ping statistics ---
13 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 12267ms
why does this happens? I can perfectly visit vlemmy.net from my browser so I really can't understand whay is this happening
You're viewing a single thread.
One possibility is that the server is configured not to respond to pings
22 0 ReplyThis is most likely the issue. Maybe just measure HTTP response times instead?
2 0 Replywhat advantages can derive from this?
1 0 ReplyPrevents some types of port scanning normally. Don't know about other advantages
7 0 ReplyICMP is one vector of a distributed denial of service attack. Also, even if not denying the service, it puts load on the network interfaces / routers of that server - everything behind the first firewall / router layer that would otherwise block the ICMP requests.
7 0 Replyokay I get it, thanks!
2 0 Reply
honestly, not much... other than warm and fuzzies for the person doing the blocking. ICMP sweeps are quick and cheap, so it stops a host from being found easily, but there are other ways to find abhost that are just as easy and cheap.
3 0 ReplyI think we block everything that's unecessary, to minimise any attack surface area
2 0 ReplyAdding to the other answers, there isa bunch of server software that comes preconfigured to ignore ICMP.
2 0 Reply