Language Is a Tool for Communication, Not for Thought, MIT Researchers Argue
Language Is a Tool for Communication, Not for Thought, MIT Researchers Argue
www.technologynetworks.com Language Is a Tool for Communication, Not for Thought, MIT Researchers Argue
Drawing on evidence from neurobiology, cognitive science and corpus linguistics, MIT researchers make the case that language is a tool for communication, not for thought.
You're viewing a single thread.
18 comments
I think transforming "it's possible to think without language" into "language is not a tool for thought" is an overreach. Definitely a lot of our internal voice is post-thought, but crystalizing those thoughts into words can provide footholds for further thought. Some would argue it's not possible to think through a complex issue without writing:
18 comments