Reminder: The FRT isn't the law!
Reminder: The FRT isn't the law!
I see that Reddit is bitching about RS-Q1 being prohibited via FRT listing rather than actual legislation. While it still sucks (since stores without balls won't sell them), everyone should keep the following in mind:
-
There is no law that gives the FRT legal authority.
-
The FRT document itself states that it is only an administrative document only right on the second page and that Criminal Code and related regulations are the prevailing authority; the RCMP website where you get it from states the same.
-
The RCMP and creator of the FRT (former RCMP, now under contract) have testified under oath that the FRT isn't a legal document.
So can we stop with the fearmongering and the "complying above and beyond the law" bullshit? All it does is make it harder for people who are actually following the law (ex. people still openly using and selling Modern Sporters).
And, in my opinion, this is not something the Crown will actively pursue if push comes to shove because they lose the power of fearmongering if written case law states that the FRT is worthless.
I see that Reddit
Girl, stop talking about your ex and move on.
since stores without balls won’t sell them
It has nothing to do with testicles or courage, it has to do with business sense. If there is a higher chance that an item is going to become illegal than another, stocking up on items that you might not be able to sell doesn't make sense.
You don't have infinite storage, or displays, or money. Having too "Dead stock" will shutter a store.If there is a higher chance that an item is going to become illegal than another, stocking up on items that you might not be able to sell doesn't make sense.
As an example, the Modern Sporter was FRT banned about 4 years ago and is still not actually illegal.
Although I'm aware there's a greater uncertainty around semi-autos in general right now.