Dearborn is home to one of the largest concentrations of Arab Americans and has traditionally been a Democratic stronghold. But this year that all changed.
They should've voted for democrats, who also love genocide. Seriously, the only "leopards ate my face" I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. This doesn't deserve mockery, no matter how misguided.
The "better choice" argument is used by democrats to follow republicans deeper and deeper into the right wing because as long as democrats are slightly less fascist, they're technically the "better choice". Now we're at the point where democrats are full-throatedly supporting genocide. You know, something that literal nazis are known for. Put that in your notes.
"Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. "...
Sounds like you are supportive of the alternative to Harris despite there being ample evidence that that alternative supports genocide more actively than Harris.
I can vote for them while criticizing their support for genocide and their generally idiotic political strategy. The other party being worse doesn't change this.
you are absolutely correct for this. really infuriating to see the bad faith argumentation coming out.
what needs to happen is constructive and significant criticism of the party, but it seems the moment you dare do that without using your vote as some kind of tone tag all bets are off and you’re MAGA.