You're viewing a single thread.
by selection of topics, by distribution of concerns, by emphasis and framing of issues, by filtering of information, by bounding of debate within certain limits. They determine, they select, they shape, they control, they restrict — in order to serve the interests of dominant, elite groups in the society.
- Chomsky 1988
... By 2024
everything the newspapers tells us is just true...
Good to know how far we've come.
everything the newspapers tells us is just true...
Where does it say that in this post?
It's written very, very small in the bottom right, in one of the bald old man's liver spots.
dO yOuR oWn ReSeArCh!1
Proceeds to Google until desirable result is found, then screech in to the void about it
I'll be sure to heed your lesson. But, just to be clear... is it that I should do somebody else's research, or that I should get somebody else to to mine...?
And, one more clarification... Is it that I should hold an opinion but not go on to Google until I find the result supporting it, or that I should not hold an opinion and then not go on to Google to form it, or not hold an opinion and then go on to Google to confirm it... No, wait, that isn't going to work... Perhaps, hold an opinion and then go on to Google to deny it... Sounds wrong.... I know, go on to Google to hold an opinion and then deny it myself... No. Have myself as an opinion and then deny Google... Get Google to give me an opinion and then hold it?
It's ok to read someone else's research. But if you automatically dismiss anything that disagrees with a previously held belief, you aren't researching, you're looking for confirmation. You can find confirmation for just about anything.
It's one thing to be critical and say "maybe the specific scenario presented here doesn't really apply to me." It's quite another to say "this can't be true because I read something before that said the opposite."
Most people "doing their own research" fall in to the latter category.
Most people "doing their own research" fall in to the latter category.
Did you Google that?
Anyway, confusion aside,I've decided to take your advice and eschew online research.
I've found some good old-fashioned print resources...
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/subscribe/
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1510779027/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?ie=UTF8&qid=&sr=
I look forward to getting stuck in to some bias-free research and clearing out those pesky old opinions. Thanks.
Online users (except [email protected]) tend to select claims that adhere to their system of beliefs and to ignore dissenting information.
Fixed that for you. Or did you not even realise you're online right now?
You should listen to your dip shit uncle who says "mainstream media is lying to you, also listen to this flat earth dude"
Proving my point. You're even actually proud of your blind fawning obsequiousness. Its sickening.
Perhaps, hold an opinion and then go on to Google to deny it... Sounds wrong....
No, that's about right. If you have an opinion, you should be challenging it with additional information. The key is not tossing anything anything that doesn't already agree with your opinion. Going in with the understanding that you are looking for information that proves you wrong is a good approach, though.
Surely you mean "one should..."
No, on second thoughts...
“First response is that it is none of your business. Or anyone’s. Second is that I knew him and we met occasionally.”
-also Noam Chomsky, but this time about why he was moving so much money for Epstein
Ohh. A whataboutism and a confirmation-bias Google search.
Does that score double?