Skip Navigation

Search

Brave lays off 27 employees

techcrunch.com Brave lays off 27 employees | TechCrunch

Web browser and search startup Brave has laid off 27 employees across the different departments, TechCrunch has learned. The company confirmed the layoffs

Brave lays off 27 employees | TechCrunch

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/21739693 >> Web browser and search startup Brave has laid off 27 employees across the different departments, TechCrunch has learned. The company confirmed the layoffs but didn’t give more details about the total headcount left nor the reason for the layoffs. PitchBook however estimates that Brave has around 191 employees, working out to Brave cutting 14% of […]

1

Where is the disable autoplay feature? Did they remove it?

Brave used to have an option to disable autoplaying of videos on web pages. But now the option is removed. I found discussions on Brave forums from users asking about it, but no one from the Brave team responds. (see this, this, and this).

I really don't want to believe Brave is intentionally being silent about this, but it's kinda obvious.

Anyone know anything about it?

0

Why doesn't brave patch out google's hidden spyware extension?

Update

Apparently this is patched out by Brave, but it is enabled by default. See u/[email protected] 's comment below!

---

Vanilla chromium gives google's websites special treatment by offering detailed CPU info, among other things. This is implemented through a hidden browser extension. You can prove this by yourself by running chrome.runtime.sendMessage("nkeimhogjdpnpccoofpliimaahmaaome", {method: "cpu.getInfo"}, (response) => {console.log(JSON.stringify(response, null, 2)); }, ); on google.com through the browser console. For me, it gives the following info:

{ "value": { "archName": "x86_64", "features": [ "mmx", "sse", "sse2", "sse3", "ssse3", "sse4_1", "sse4_2", "avx" ], "modelName": "Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2620M CPU @ 2.70GHz", "numOfProcessors": 4, "processors": [ { "usage": { "idle": 28238205, "kernel": 827581, "total": 32762960, "user": 3697174 } }, { "usage": { "idle": 1455131, "kernel": 743391, "total": 6209241, "user": 4010719 } }, { "usage": { "idle": 1448653, "kernel": 769970, "total": 6068506, "user": 3849883 } }, { "usage": { "idle": 1450274, "kernel": 744886, "total": 5948597, "user": 3753437 } } ], "temperatures": [] } }

Note that this doesn't work on other websites like lemmy.world, only google.

What I am confused about is that I can replicate this behavior in Brave. Why does brave reveal this information to google, and to google only? From what I understand, it can be used for fingerprinting and tracking. Shouldn't this be patched out? Is my testing methodology flawed? Will this be fixed?

Brave version: Version 1.67.123 Chromium: 126.0.6478.126 (Official Build) unknown (64-bit) running on linux via flatpak

2

I recently noticed when I received a login alert from a service provider, that does not spoof the Operating System. That can, depending on your OS, enhance finger-printing and be a dead

I recently noticed when I received a login alert from a service provider, that @bravebrowser does not spoof the Operating System. That can, depending on your OS, enhance finger-printing and be a dead giveaway #BraveBrowser. There definitely needs to be an option to manually or automatically spoof the OS.

0

Brave has no intuitive search ... search query: Bruins 2024 playoffs. Return results: stuff from '22, '23, then stuff about Rnd 2 ... nothing about last nights HUGE game 7.

@bravebrowser Brave has no intuitive search ... search query: Bruins 2024 playoffs. Return results: stuff from '22, '23, then stuff about Rnd 2 ... nothing about last nights HUGE game 7.

Then I go to Google (ugh) with the same query. First return is the box score followed by a game 7 highlight reel from YT. This is why Google owns search results.

1

Has anyone else noticed that the @washingtonpost has stepped up their paywall game? Accessing with cookies and Javascript disabled now only gives a short summary cc

Has anyone else noticed that the @washingtonpost has stepped up their paywall game? Accessing with cookies and Javascript disabled now only gives a short summary cc @bravebrowser

0

The UK government's attempts to erode your online #privacy never cease. 🇬🇧🕵️

The UK government's attempts to erode your online #privacy never cease. 🇬🇧🕵️

Luckily you've got Tuta in your corner! 🥊

We've teamed up with academics, #cybersecurity researchers, & other privacy oriented companies, like @element and @bravebrowser to fight back!

👉 https://cdt.org/insights/open-letter-from-security-experts-voices-concerns-over-the-proposed-changes-to-uk-investigatory-powers-acts-notices-regime/

4

Vous avez déjà des messages de (https://mastodon.social/tags/youtube) concernant le bloqueur de pub ? Je suis surpris de pas en avoir encore reçu (j'utilise ad blocker plus) ou par défaut su

Vous avez déjà des messages de #youtube concernant le bloqueur de pub ? Je suis surpris de pas en avoir encore reçu (j'utilise ad blocker plus) ou par défaut sur @bravebrowser

0

Tanks. (https://mastodon.social/@brave) (https://lemmy.ml/c/bravebrowser)

2

Mozilla announces they will ship GPC (Global Privacy Control) in Firefox 120. Note : the settings will be done by the user choice and not by default which is the case via DuckDuckGo or Brave cc [@mozi

Mozilla announces they will ship GPC (Global Privacy Control) in Firefox 120. Note : the settings will be done by the user choice and not by default which is the case via DuckDuckGo or Brave cc @mozilla @bravebrowser https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-platform/c/373F82Jzcjs/m/ImZKgRNIAQAJ

10

(https://mastodon.social/@brave) (https://lemmy.ml/c/bravebrowser) Cloudflare announced full and complete support for encrypted clienthello on all cloudflare plans and web prope

@brave @bravebrowser Cloudflare announced full and complete support for encrypted clienthello on all cloudflare plans and web properties via their blog. Will brave, the company that prides itself on fixing the internet follow suite for brave.com, the brave.com onion and the web servers the Brave Browser itself connects to. Encrypted clienthello, along with DNS over HTTPS, DNSSEC, TLS1.3 and proper certificates identifying the webmaster responsible are essential in today's day and age.

1

Brave on Linux, different?

Brave on Linux, different?

Am I the only who thinks that @brave feels different on Linux than on Windows? Not only that some icons look different and that some defaults have different settings, why is "Forgetful Browsing" disabled in the flags (brave://flags), while it's already released on Windows and Android? I checked if I'm maybe using a older version, but nope. I use the same version of Brave as on Windows.

\#privacy #browser @bravebrowser

3

Saw many people giving 'instructions' on how to make Chrome not spy on you.

Saw many people giving 'instructions' on how to make Chrome not spy on you. Why not just use a privacy friendly browser and save all the hassle? I've been using @bravebrowser for years now and I am VERY happy! https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/googles-widely-opposed-ad-platform-the-privacy-sandbox-launches-in-chrome/

5

Just a reminder that the guy behind (https://lemmy.ml/c/bravebrowser) (https://mastodon.social/@brave) was kicked from Mozilla for being a bigoted piece of shit, and that he con

Just a reminder that the guy behind @bravebrowser @brave was kicked from Mozilla for being a bigoted piece of shit, and that he continues to be a piece of shit attacking the health care workers who saved millions of lives during the pandemic.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/22/business/brave-brendan-eich-covid-19.html

\#covid #brave #brendaneich

24

Is brave or firefox with ublock better in terms of resource consumption?

I'm choosing a main browser, and I think that firefox with ublock and brave are probably equally good in terms of privacy and security, both of them look quite nice, and both are FOSS. The final thing that I'm considering is resource consumption. This reddit post shows that firefox is better than brave in benchmarks and ram consumption, but what about when firefox has ublock running and brave has all their preinstalled "extension" like brave rewards and wallet disabled (except brave shields is left enabled)?

6

v1.56 and still no Forgetful Browsing?

brave.com Forgetful Browsing | Brave Browser

Forgetful Browsing is similar to, but more powerful and protective than, popular browsing extensions and private browsing modes. It's another example of Brave offering the most powerful privacy features of any popular browser.

Forgetful Browsing | Brave Browser

As of writing this post, Brave browser version 1.56.9 was recently released, and "Forgetful Browsing" is still only available as an experimental flag.

Also they've just skipped versions directly from 1.52 to 1.56, explained here.

Your thoughts?

1

(https://mastodon.social/@brave)

@brave @bravebrowser Is there going to be a (Google) Maps version on Brave Search anytime soon ?

0

<p><span class="h-card"><a href="https://lemmy.ml/c/bravebrowser" class="u-url mention">@<span>brave

@bravebrowser Hi,I'm #VisuallyImpaired & use #Voiceover, which is Apple's #Screen-reader. I'm encountering a serious issue with the #iOS version of your app. This affects both the #AppStore & #beta versions. When trying to delete bookmarks, the app immediately crashes. Can you please fix this? This is my favorite browser!

0

Brave Browser 1.37.116 Desktop + Mobile

github.com Release notes for `1.37.x - Release #7` by kjozwiak · Pull Request #22333 · brave/brave-browser

Resolves #22332 Submitter Checklist: I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed, or that I have requested one There is a ticket for my issue Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR...

Release notes for `1.37.x - Release #7` by kjozwiak · Pull Request #22333 · brave/brave-browser

Mobile

1.37.116

  • Improved general performance by fixing cosmetic filters. (#22030)
  • Added "Enable Tab Group auto creation" setting under "Appearance" which controls the ability to open links in separate tabs. (#22105)
  • Fixed rounding issues under Brave Wallet via the "Send" and "Swap" panels by increasing the digits after the decimal to 0.00000000 (8 digits) from 0.000000 (6 digits). (#22257)
  • Fixed crash when attempting to send opened tab to another devices on sync chain using "Send to your devices". (#22128)
  • Upgraded Chromium to 100.0.4896.127. (#22318) (Changelog for 100.0.4896.127)

Desktop

0

Brave 1.37 for iOS: Sync Passwords, Improved Adblock, Night Mode Toggle Switch added

In this release, we:

  • Added the ability to sync passwords saved in the Brave browser between desktop and your iOS device.
  • Improved Brave Shields, especially on sites like youtube.com.
  • Added Night Mode, making it easier to view and read websites in low light.

!

0
The UK government's attempts to erode your online #privacy never cease. 🇬🇧🕵️
  • @Tutanota @element @bravebrowser
    ALL UK PEOPLE LEAVE TO EU...

    FIND ANOTHER WAY AND MORE POSSIBILITY EVEN FOR A HOLIDAY... YOU CAN VISIT ME JUST AS A TEST!

  • I've been using the Brave Talk from [@bravebrowser](https://lemmy.ml/c/bravebrowser) because I am in this journey of 'privacy matter'
  • @[email protected], “@bravebrowser” is not an offical user account of Brave Software. In fact it’s not a user account at all: it’s a Lemmy community: https://lemmy.ml/c/bravebrowser Please read the community guidelines before posting to it in the future.

  • Mozilla announces they will ship GPC (Global Privacy Control) in Firefox 120. Note : the settings will be done by the user choice and not by default which is the case via DuckDuckGo or Brave cc [@mozi
  • @mintycactus No matter if Brave removes it or not, the question is : Is DNT followed by vendors behind? I've tried to add more context here => https://mastodon.social/@ANderagakura/111334483858036981

    Regarding Mozilla, today the plan is to set GPC by default

  • Mozilla announces they will ship GPC (Global Privacy Control) in Firefox 120. Note : the settings will be done by the user choice and not by default which is the case via DuckDuckGo or Brave cc [@mozi
  • @vctrmrl @Engywuck My point is kinda philosophical, legal and product.

    For me the user should be free to give the consent or not after understanding clearly every choice. Because in any case, a default mode does not necessarily give a clear explanation to the user

  • Mozilla announces they will ship GPC (Global Privacy Control) in Firefox 120. Note : the settings will be done by the user choice and not by default which is the case via DuckDuckGo or Brave cc [@mozi
  • @mintycactus Apple removed DNT from Safari and the other browsers did it as well because it was not used.

    Today, GPC is being developed by a large coalition including W3C @w3c. The result is more and more publishers and browser implements it to replace DNT and be aligned with some law (e. g. CCPA etc...)

  • Mozilla announces they will ship GPC (Global Privacy Control) in Firefox 120. Note : the settings will be done by the user choice and not by default which is the case via DuckDuckGo or Brave cc [@mozi
  • @ANderagakura @Engywuck Under the GDPR, opt-out is not an option, so if the approach taken is not an opt-in one it is arguably unlawful in the EU.
    I wonder how they plan to address the different legal requirements from different legislations...

  • Mozilla announces they will ship GPC (Global Privacy Control) in Firefox 120. Note : the settings will be done by the user choice and not by default which is the case via DuckDuckGo or Brave cc [@mozi
  • @Engywuck I still think enabling the user to opt-in / opt-out is the right thing. But to do that, the user needs to be fully informed about every option and the platform has to be enough clear and flexible.

  • Brave on Linux, different?
  • @mintycactus So thanks for writing your thoughs down, before I just write a whole text about with what I agree, I just say I agree with the most things you said, but there are just few things I see a bit different or disgagree with:

    -"it is both Google and not-Google"

    I have to disgagree with that one, Brave is less Google then default firefox, in fact Brave removes a lot of the trash chromium stuff which Google implemented (they made a article with on github abt it) and make zero connections to Google domains, not even Google safebrowsing.

    -"I think it dies fast and I am OK if it just dies"

    I totally disagree with that, I don't use Firefox as my main browser, but I like it and also the Firefox Forks which exist like LibreWolf and Waterfox, we definitly need competition in the browser scene and Firefox does a pretty good job so far, just with few major things they are killing themselve which isn't good..

    -"Absolutely bad for web apps (no icons, no PiP)"

    It's "okay" on Windows, idk how it is on Linux, never tried

    -"Firefox color tabs ROCKS, Brave profiles is a shadow alternative."

    I think this is personally preference, I actually like Brave profiles more since they fit much better into my workflow, but I would love to have smth like Firefox's isolated tabs feature on Brave. Firefox has also profiles like Chromium, is just hidden in the "about:profiles" tab which is sad, bc I think there are few people out there who actually would love to use this.

    -"I love Firefox community and I hate Brave community"

    I don't like both very much, except few inviduals.

    -"Let’s start with Brave, they are super greedy and stupid"

    Not they from the privacy community, but many of them in general, yea.

    -"Firefox community is OK, until things are about alternatives, they isolate themselves into a bubble and are fine with this chamber"

    The Firefox community is very toxic, if you have a different opinion as them, when you start critizing Mozilla for some bad things they have done or mention that you use Brave as ur Main Browser they start harrassing you. Some of them are also toxic over people who use forks like LibreWolf or Waterfox.

  • Brave on Linux, different?
  • @mintycactus Yea, but I wasn't talking about Nightly or Beta, I meant the stable version.

  • Saw many people giving 'instructions' on how to make Chrome not spy on you.
  • @DrPinkeee @bravebrowser

    It is time to admit that Apple, Alphabet, Meta, and Hurricane Electric have become as abusive as the monopolies they replaced.

    Corporations are driven by shareholders and stakeholders, and their need for more money plus non-ROI costs imposed by taxes lead to greedy corporations.

  • Just a reminder that the guy behind [@bravebrowser](https://lemmy.ml/c/bravebrowser) [@brave](https://mastodon.social/@brave) was kicked from Mozilla for being a bigoted piece of shit, and that he con
  • @reflex @badgrandpa

    He already made an apology in his blog. Why do you think he is a terrible person? People can change with new evidence and time. He is a computer scientist, not a biologist or evolutionist. That was in 2014; may people and politicians have already changed their mind now. He clearly stated that he is for inclusiveness.

    https://brendaneich.com/2014/03/inclusiveness-at-mozilla/