Android @lemdro.id ijeff @lemdro.id 12mo ago

Huawei's HarmonyOS Will No Longer Support Android Apps - Pandaily

pandaily.com Huawei’s HarmonyOS Will No Longer Support Android Apps

Huawei's HarmonyOS system will no longer be compatible with Android applications. NetEase, Meituan, and other companies are urgently recruiting HarmonyOS developers.

You're viewing a single thread.

23 comments

Makes sense, Java sucks and native apps are much faster and use less resources.

Once they paid Tencent, Baidu and Alibaba to port their apps, basically 95% of the Chinese market is satisfied.

You only need WeChat, taobao, alipay, pinduoduo, Baidu and amap in China.

Because they don't need to worry about selling their device abroad, they have the luxury to not only give up to google apps, but to all the apps

iPhone users are also having similar limitations with all the apps in the app store blacklisted except a few dozens manually approved by govt, but Apple is still selling a lot of units, even if it's just a "WeChat mobile terminal" and not a real smartphone anymore
- Java is not as bad as you're making it out to be. It's always funny to see people list the problems with Java as if they're obvious. They're trade offs.
  
  With this change, you're right, they certainly won't have to worry about selling the device abroad.
  
  the phones are already impossible to sell abroad without the google apps and a locked bootloader, it changes nothing for them
  
  because they are in control of the platform they don't need to run everything in an interpreter. The cpu is and will always be arm-based, any interpreted language is a waste of power
  
  I don't know whether they currently sell phones abroad, but I know in the past they have sold abroad. It's a big market.
  
  So it certainly affects them organizationally. Any phone that they want to sell abroad will have completely different software. They'd likely have to use an entirely different team of people.
  
  any interpreted language is a waste of power
  
  It's not a waste of power. There are a lot of tradeoffs like ease of development and fault tolerance. And the cost of the interpreter is greatly mitigated at run time. Please just stop talking about this. It's not as good of a point as you think it is.
- Java definitely does not suck. There is a reason it runs virtually everywhere, from SIM cards to most servers of the world through Spring
  
  interpreted languages are inherently slower than native code. Because huawei controls the hardware they don't need portability and can focus on speed
  
  on a phone, using java will give all the disadvantages with no advantages
  
  look at iphone vs android, for years apple had better battery life and better performance even with half the ram, a worse cpu and smaller batteries
  
  Java isn't an interpreted language any more than C. Java gets compiled into its own machine code developed by Sun. That machine code can be converted to native code or just run "interpreted." (which is more like emulation.)
  
  Maybe you should learn more about something before you criticize it.
  
  I can't think to any program made in java that isn't a memory hog.
  
  Look at the performance of Minecraft java vs native
  
  Or vuze that uses 20x the memory of qbittorrent for doing the same stuff but with less features
  
  So either java devs don't know how to optimize code, or the language itself has some problems
  
  Of course there comes the Minecraft comparison. Which also conveniently ignores the fact that Minecraft can run incredibly fast using certain performance mods. It's not Java, it's just shitty programming / code that hogs its performance.
  
  i did a comparison also with vuze, which is incredibly inefficient compared to other clients
  
  can’t think to any program made in java that isn’t a memory hog.
  
  Can you think of any Java programs that aren’t Minecraft, tho?
  
  ok, give me a list of programs made in java that are faster or use less resources than a similar program written in any other decent language when run on the same hardware.
  
  The list has zero entries.
  
  The language has nothing to do with what you describe in your last paragraph. There are a lot of reasons what that was happening, and using Java is not one of them. Just the openess of the OS and how it was written was enough to justify such a difference vs a closed OS with a fraction of the possibilities
  
  Also Android is not using just Java, otherwise you would be able to run any normal Java app without "hacks"
- [This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
  
  Android has moved on from Java 7 for years, Android 14 is Java 17 now
  
  https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14
  
  [This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
  
  harmonyos is almost aosp where they did a "search and replace" for "android" strings
  
  i understood "HarmonyOS NEXT" is different, if it's not rewritten from scratch then it's a waste of time+money, forcing devs to port apps for "it's almost the same but it's a bit different" it's not a smart idea
  
  Could be worse. I'd take a Java 7 over Objective-C any day of the day.
  
  Also what exactly is stopping developers from using Kotlin? It compiles to the same bytecode. Is there a framework that can't be imported? I thought IntelliJ handed all of that, not Google.
- Also the native apps look like they are written on Java? Or based on JVM
  
  if it's still based on a jvm then they're dumb and it's a decision that makes no sense

23 comments