We are the highest non-european team. We can't expect them to beat European teams who have better resources and can leverage facilities used by mens.
Their leagues bring in magnitudes more money and thus can invest more than we can ever hope to match. And considering the majority of professional development and clout here is aimed at oval ball sports.
Didn't count France as it was through a penalty shootout which could go 50/50. We beat them but it was far from convincing and even if we got to penalty shootouts for all our games it's unlikely we'd win all of them.
Yes we do have players but we don't have depth. England and Spain and even Sweden have 95 percent of players in the European leagues.
And in terms of Spain and England in top teams of top leagues. Someone playing for Sydney FC wouldn't even get a look in for the Spanish or English side.
Yeah, nah. They played hard. Overall the game was allowed to be played with some contact, which I like.
I thought a couple of their earlier tackles were borderline yellow, and maybe a couple of fouls on Aussies missed. Later on the continuous fouls seemed like yellows should have been given. They were. Too late to make a difference.
Thank you for answering, I genuinely wasn't sure as I'm new to all of this, but I don't want to be stereotypical and just blame the ref. Sweden were very clean and played really well.