Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"
Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"
Sam "wrong side of FOSS history" Altman must be pissing himself.
Direct Nitter Link:
https://nitter.lucabased.xyz/jiayi_pirate/status/1882839370505621655
You're viewing a single thread.
They finetuned 1.5-3b models. This is a non-story
113 8 ReplyI feel like the author here doesnt know what the definition of "breakthrough" is.
14 0 ReplyLike many AI headlines, to be honest. Even in the open source world, there is tons of fudging and hype. Been that way since way before ChatGPT became popular.
Still, it’s cool the whole finetuning pipeline even runs, and theoretically scaling up is just a matter of money
19 0 ReplyYup and it's not even testing general reasoning. They didn't have money for that.
12 10 Replyfuck almighty have these DeepSeek threads been attracting a lot of LLM “experts”
28 0 ReplyLLM experts aka poop sommeliers
22 0 ReplyMrPoopyButthole
Fucking hell what the hell is with the usernames do they want to be made fun of?
11 0 ReplyIt’s a Rick and Morty 🤮 character
11 0 Replylol that's worse! 👍
9 0 Reply
Is General reasoning in the room with us now?
26 0 ReplyThere's no way to know since they didn't have the money to test.
6 0 ReplyIs that the guy who sells insurance with Shaq?
6 0 ReplyIt's actually "Reasonings General", common misconception
15 0 ReplyI heard someone say Private Reasoning was around the corner. Think they’re related?
12 0 ReplyI hear Private Reasoning of the first through nth LLM Understander Corps is highly motivated
4 0 Reply