Skip Navigation

🦋 Bluesky Social @lemmy.ml airportline @lemmy.ml 2w ago

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

www.technologyreview.com We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

If we don’t act soon, our online world will continue to be run at the whim of capricious billionaires.

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

Technik @feddit.org effzehkoelle @feddit.org 2w ago

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

www.technologyreview.com /2025/01/17/1110063/we-need-to-protect-the-protocol-that-runs-bluesky/

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

6 4

Hacker News @lemmy.bestiver.se RSS Bot @lemmy.bestiver.se

3w ago

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

www.technologyreview.com /2025/01/17/1110063/we-need-to-protect-the-protocol-that-runs-bluesky/

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

12 4

MIT Technology Review @rss.ponder.cat paywall @rss.ponder.cat

3w ago

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

www.technologyreview.com /2025/01/17/1110063/we-need-to-protect-the-protocol-that-runs-bluesky/

We need to protect the protocol that runs Bluesky

3 0

4 comments

Particle continues on to say Jack all about what to do to protect the protocol

Also

Nobody: activitypub
- The article talks about launching independent servers completely reliant on Bluesky PBLLC so that users may migrate away if Bluesky is ever threatened with enshittification.
  
  Problem is that running independent AT Protocol server is more costly than running an ActivityPub server.
  
  Bluesky is more popular than Mastodon, but there is still only the official Bluesky server. Meanwhile there’s hundreds and maybe thousands of federated ActivityPub servers.