Careful, I remember somebody posting evidence some time back showing the author was some hyper passive aggressive person who'd sic their fanbase on you.
Referring more to the comments and discussion in that thread rather than the comic, in case that wasn't clear. In any case, I have no personal experience or fight in this.
So you're just repeating some random people online who are complaining about a woman...who pushes back against some online trolls/haters?
Lol who gives a shit and why would you just throw out such a random claim when you haven't seen it for yourself anyway? Redditors, famous for reacting respectfully to women and women content creators.
Was not even aware she was female until I looked this up, and did not bring up anything to do with gender, so you seem to be making this a sexist fight for no reason.
I remember somebody posting evidence some time back showing the author was some hyper passive aggressive person who’d sic their fanbase on you
Remember, this was your claim.
I looked it up and couldn't see any evidence of it, and your only source was a collection of redditors complaining about the author pushing back against dude-bro style comments. I never said you brought up the author's sex, I said redditors complaining about a woman was not a good source.
If you're a content creator with a reach of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of views (r/comics has 2M+ subscribers, and these comics get posted there regularly), and you're using your actual comic to make fun of / belittle critics? Also taking in account her fanbase seems extremely vocal for some reason? Yes, I believe my claim has been justified. How do you NOT find the linked comic cringy AF?
I never said I liked the comics, and you didn't originally claim that they were cringy. I'm pushing back on your unfounded claim that the author harassed or incited her fan base to harass people who don't like the comics.
"Yeah the author does some fucked up things."
"Really?"
"No, but I don't like her comics."
Just say you don't like the comics and leave it at that, ya goofball.
It always strikes me as anomalous that there are some that feel compelled to comment that pizzacake isn't funny but don't bother expressing approval or disapproval of any other comics
Pearls before Swine is awesome. Same with Red and Rover. And of course the true classic of Far Side. And Bizarro is fun, especially the "seek and find".
It's a public forum. That's how things work. If it bothers the original artist then that person should either keep their stuff off the Internet or learn to ignore the negativity.
Ah you misunderstood. There are some people that comment positively in comics that they like and some that comment negatively in comics they don't like and some that do both. The thing that is weird to me is that, seemingly unique to this comic, there are people that feel they have to say that "it's not funny" just for pizzacake. This group is different from the group that comments negatively in comics in general. They don't leave comments, positive or negative, for any other comics.
Now if you make the habit of going into other comic posts that you don't care for and leave your criticism on those posts then you fall into the non-anomalous group that has consistent behavior. If you have any pattern of leaving commentary on the quality of comics then you don't fall into the group I'm talking about really. But if you only comment about comics on just pizzacake posts to just say they are not funny then the shoe might fit.
Did you express approval or disapproval for other comics in other posts?