Great news. Hopefully that means if Israel does it anyway they will pay a price too heavy to bear, and we can put the whole "escalate to cover our Gaza situation" thing to bed.
I don't see Iran going so hard that's on the table. The last strike was beautifully calibrated to re-establish deterrence while doing little politically useful damage, for example.
The real goal here for Israel is to bolster Netanyahu's hold on power. Iran would just have to hit back hard enough it makes his situation worse, not better, and they could safely do that without the US umbrella. Of course, it all depends on what "won't support" means. Time for me to read the article.
I have seen nothing to suggest we will cut aid or weapons. Just we won’t directly attack Iran.
I’m pro-Israel but the best way to end the escalation is to stop sending weapons at this point. I don’t see Iran attacking again unless Israel counter attacks.
We need to say stop it and make it clear, you counter attack and we cut aid.
Iran cannot invade Israel. Israel cannot invade Iran. Israel attacked a consulate. They started this and we can stop it
Allergies. It’s possible there are some typos. My eyes are on fire.
Pro-Israel doesn’t mean pro-escalation when they act poorly. We have rules to how the world works and they violated those by attacking the consulate.
Now they are trying to escalate a conflict with Iran.
We don’t need a war in the Middle East right now. We can reduce that by reducing aid.
American has become so partisan. You can support something but still have a redline.
If you cheer on Iran's strikes on Israel, remember that in addition to Jewish Israelis, Arabs, Palestinians, Muslims & Christians could lose their lives in the attack. Iranian projectiles endanger Ramallah, Bethlehem, Nablus, Amman, Lebanon, Syria & Iraq. War's not an online game
You see. I remark that missiles have landed in a lot of places putting a lot of different people in jeopardy. The response is "Isreal does too". Then i inform that Israel doesn't fly missiles. Comprende
I read your comments several times. I don't want you to explain it again. I want you to explain it better.
For example you say "Israel doesn't use many air to ground missiles. They fly airplanes." By definition air to ground missiles are launched from airplanes. Since this statement makes no sense, what did you mean to say?
Bottom line is Isreai won't throw missles all over the middle east, because they don't use air to ground missles
For example you say "Israel doesn't use many air to ground missiles. They fly airplanes." By definition air to ground missiles are launched from airplanes. Since this statement makes no sense, what did you mean to say
Missles fly. By definition they all come the air. Where they are supposed to land is what is important. An airplane can lauch an air to air or a air to ground or an air to ship. The same is true on the ground. Isreal launches air to air through the Iron Dome, but what it doesn't do, as Iran did last night, is launch air to ground from a launcher
Some retaliation seems necessary. Unless someone hits back the israeli bullying will continue. Bidens refusal to tell israel to stop trying to start WW3 is what got us here to begin with.