You're viewing a single thread.
All Comments
48 comments
Btrfs because I've had constant issues with zfs in multiple different times.
Everyone praises zfs so I'm sure it's something I'm missing, but I've had very little issue with btrfs, other than it's incomplete feature set.
19 1 ReplyWhat kind of issues?
4 0 ReplyIts mostly that due to licensing issues it can't be included in the Linux kernel like btrfs and thus is prone to breaking at very in-opportune times.
IMHO both are fine, but btrfs is more hassle free and good enough (tm) for hobby self-hosters.
11 2 ReplyHe's talking about kernel taint. That is annoying in Linux.
4 1 Reply
48 comments
Scroll to top