You're viewing a single thread.
I can guarantee you can get a pretty nice hotel for less than that without bullshit fees. Anyone still using Airbnb or any of the other short term rentals deserve what they get.
In general, AirBnB is where we get places where we want to sleep 10 or 12 in one place.
Sure, but this is 2 guests unless they’re planning on lying about it. In which case, double whammy when they get hit with another fee for extra people.
Sorry it wasn't a rebuttal. Rather, I was agreeing thatvfor situations like this a hotel is better, bit it's hard to match AirBnB when you want to sleep lots of people in one place.
Not for this one but when you say anyone... families get a better deal with Airbnb than hotels generally.
And when you have a baby or a toddler a kitchen is pretty much mandatory.
There are plenty of hotels with kitchens, though? I know they're often called extended stay hotels, but you can still just book a few nights.
Are you kidding? It's totally common for hotels to charge 50 bucks a night in bullshit fees
I have never had a hotel charge bullshit fees. Rental rate and tax are all I have ever paid.
Lots of hotels tack on "amenity fees" or "resort fees" separate from those. It's pretty obnoxious, especially since they don't show them to you til you're halfway through booking.
Parking (at a remote resort with no other reasonable way of accessing) comes to mind as one of the bullshit'ish fees I've had to pay, but most of the rest are usually fees passed up from the municipality etc
Big city mandatory valet comes to my mind.
In the US it is common to have an amenities fee that you will only know, in most cases, the day of your check in. The fee applies whether you use the amenities or not.
California just passed a law banning any mandatory fee if it isn't included in the advertised rates; the ban goes into force starting middle of next year.
The new law, which takes effect on July 1, 2024, "make[s] unlawful advertising, displaying, or offering a price for a good or service that does not include all mandatory fees or charges other than taxes or fees imposed by a government on the transaction." If a fee is not optional and cannot be removed from a bill, the fee has to be disclosed from the top.
That being said, I would imagine that there is some wiggle room on "mandatory". Like, a hotel is going to be allowed to charge for use of items in a minibar, for example -- that's not a mandatory fee. I don't know what the bar is for notification that a given action will incur a fee.
That's great for California.
Right turn on red didn't exist anywhere until some states started allowing it; a lot of people thought that it would be too dangerous. Then it worked out okay, and other states added it, and eventually essentially everyone was doing it.
Just saying that it sounds like the direction things are going right now is to legislatively-restricting what hotels can charge without disclosure.
From my skim online, it sounds like the addition of hotel fees like this is relatively recent, and so this is something of a backlash.
California is so big that often, when they make a law, companies follow it nationally. It can be cheaper than having to maintain different rules for sifferent states
Around 2004-5 I regularly stayed at a large chain hotel near Tucson airport (something like Doubletree, but I’m not sure if it was that one). They charged a daily fee for the phone in your room. Not for using it, mind you, just for the phone being there. And no, they did not have rooms without phones.
Last week I stayed in a hotel for 3 days at a said and done price that was still about $100 cheaper than this 2 night Airbnb's base price, not even adding in their fees.
Ok? That tells us nothing without comparing location, etc.