What games do you think should NEVER be remastered, because they're close to perfect as they are?
What games do you think should NEVER be remastered, because they're close to perfect as they are?
Looking for games where a remaster could never stack up to the original. Inspired by post, asking the opposite, what games do you think are worthy of a remaster: https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201 [https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201]
Any games where a remaster could never stack up to the original.
Inspired by this post, asking the opposite, what games do you think are worthy of a remaster: https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201
You're viewing a single thread.
Honestly hard question because essentially you want a game that would be worse now. Something that playing now would tranish it then make it better even with updated graphics/movement. Or something you know the company would take a direction which would make it negative.
Something like redoing the original Super Mario 1, 2 and 3. Where the updated graphics and changes to game play takes away from the original pixel feel. As I feel Nintendo would probably use modern day Mario design.
or mass effects removal of zoooming in on mirandas buttWasn't Mario remastered for SNES? I preferred those over the NES versions.
They were remastered (which I think hurts the original argument), but I as I understand, the question of which is better is pretty divisive
I am unaware of any difference other than the obvious visual one. I never owned a SNES back in the day, so I kinda missed All Stars, and even when emulating became cool, I never saw a reason to emulate a game that then made me choose which game I wanted to play, rather than just choose the ROM for the game I wanted.
Agreed, SMW was actually the first thing that popped into my head when writing the post subject, SMB1-3 definitely qualify too. I'd put them all on equal footing in this regard.