It’s no surprise that the benefits were met with more enthusiasm in liberal states and in industries where women were more represented. The opposite was found in conservative states and in industries that skewed more male.
Thoughts? Is this a viable way to help women seeking abortions in states where they are banned? As the article says, it seems all it takes is one man from Alabama to make a big mess.
i think it could contribute to a brain drain from red states to blue states. but then theres the problem where some states like oklahoma and texas are trying to make it illegal to get abortions in other states.
its a nice benefit to have but we need national legislation
I am sorry, my comment was meant to be a summary of the article and provoke discussion about its findings. So far, things are split along idealogical lines.
In case it is not clear, this magazine is in support of women’s reproductive and abortion rights, and does not support the overturning of Roe vs Wade.