You're viewing part of a thread.
Just so I understand, you are taking credit for Trump winning by saying that Harris would have won if people like you didn't sit back and do nothing while fascism took over?
I'm not sure if, as a leftist, taking credit for the upcoming downfall of America and its people is a great survival strategy. Things are about to get really bad in this country, and people are going to choose sides like their lives depend on it. Are you absolutely certain you want to be self-identifying as a person who put Trump back in the White House?
You do not understand.
I am saying Harris should not have tried to be a lesser evil but a greater good.
You could do a "this is worthless" meme with this comment right here.
Doing a little less genocide is bad
Not doing genocide is good.
How is this so difficult to understand?
Because not doing genocide is not on the menu. You have a little less genocide or a lot more genocide. That's your lot
If you refuse to choose because you don't like either, you end up with the one you like the least.
Because not doing genocide is not on the menu.
Indeed. My argument is Chef Harris should have put that on the menu.
Imagine the stakes. Not genocide vs genocide! The moral imperative on the ballot!
The US is going to go more and more fascist because the left can't get their shit together, and a big part of the reason we can't get our shit together is because the Democrats keep dividing us.
She could have, if enough people voted for her.
Enough people would have voted for her if she did. But she did not.