How bad are search results? Compare Google, Bing, Marginalia, Kagi, and ChatGPT

I appreciate the author took the time to do this, but I'm a little skeptical of their results. I pay for Kagi, so decided to directly paste their queries into it just to see -- while none of the 'bad' results would have completely flipped based on the author's ranking system, the "very bad" would have been just "bad" or possibly "ok". Adblock showed my uBlock as result number 5; youtube-dl was result number 10, and so on. Mind you, I am running it with uBlock origin and although I haven't done any custom rankings it is quite possible that some of the other settings (geographic point of origin, for example) would have affected the results. I'm curious to try it with some of the other engines now (as well as a completely blank slate for Kagi) and see -- because at least in that instance, I'm not entirely sure these are replicatable results.

Also: a bone to pick with the tire query -- the answers the author were scoring higher didn't answer the question "why do wider tires have better grip" (which is what the author searched), but instead queries which answered "what are the advantages of wider tires". Not sure it would actually change the proportionate results, but assuming their bullet list is all they were looking for in the answer, it's hard to criticize any results for not answering the slightly different question than what they posed.