You're viewing part of a thread.
I guess I was mistaken, you're not getting better at this at all.
You aren't refuting any of the points I made.
I don't think I need to since your opinion regarding my character doesn't matter to me.
See, I think it's because you can't. I think you lack the ability to do so and I also think I pretty much nailed it.
If I cared about what you thought, I'd probably take the time to legitimize or refute your unfounded kneejerk thoughts on the matter but since I don't, I won't.
Uh huh. Or you are trying to find ways to dance around and deflect from the points I made because they are right and you can't refute them. John was kinda mean to bigots and that rustled your jimmies. Why are you so emotionally sensitive to the cause of treating bigots with kid gloves?
Since just thinking you're right is enough for you, I wonder why you've not simply declared yourself the victor of this comment thread. Surely you've said it's true enough times.
I made observations and points based on fact and straight forward reasoning, that's not "simply thinking I'm right". You can't or won't address those points so I kinda am the defacto winner. Get some courage. Stop worming around.
I kinda am the defacto winner.
There you go. I knew you'd get around to it. All you needed was a supportive nudge. I am glad I could help.
You didn't help. In this conversation, kind like in society, you've been a bit of a dead weight. You think that by not addressing or acknowledging the questions I've asked and the points I've made that you will some how appear clever or aloof. You come across more like a dog that won't look at the corner it shit in while being scolded.
These thoughts of yours that you mentioned at the beginning, the ones that are reprehensible to some and an echo chamber to others. Are John and the rest decent society the ones that would find your thoughts reprehensible? Are bigots the ones that would find your thoughts to be an echo chamber?