Skip Navigation

Video | How Stonehenge will look once the A303 tunnel is built

constructionmanagement.co.uk Video | How Stonehenge will look once the A303 tunnel is built

The government has given formal consent to the construction of a new tunnel under the historic site of Stonehenge.

Video | How Stonehenge will look once the A303 tunnel is built
12

You're viewing a single thread.

12 comments
  • As much as I like getting a glimpse of Stonehenge every time I drive past, I support these plans.

    Currently, the road goes from dual carriageway to oncoming traffic, with a limit of 50mph.
    Once the traffic gets busy, all it takes is a few people rubbernecking to cause a large slowdown. And the merge at the end of the Amesbury Bypass can take 20 minutes on a bad day.
    Adding extra lanes on the surface is unthinkable, and any route around would end up being a silly length.

    If I'm reading the plans correctly, this also duals the road past Winterbourne Stoke. So possibly removing the chaos that can be Lonwbarrow Roundabout.

    • Wouldn't it be cheaper and more effective to just plant some trees? I would rather the money was spent elsewhere. This is a shocking waste.

      • I'm not sure what you mean?
        It's a two-part problem, the road going from dual carriageway to single, and people wanting to grab a look on the way past.
        Stonehenge is a unesco site on a plain, so widening the existing road, or planting a huge row of trees, is not going to go down well with the druids.

        Getting the road out of site (by either tunnel or diversion) will go a long way to de-modernising the surroundings. (And a fun fact: Half of stonehenge was underpinned with concrete in the last century! So any ways to make it more natural are a plus.)

        • I don't object to a road being built. I object to £2.3b being spent on it. If the view is so much of a problem then spent a lot less and block it. Add a mound, put some trees there, even a wall would be cheaper.

          If de-modernising is such a good thing can we all have it? OFC not because it would be bloody stupid, much like this hair-brained scheme is.

12 comments