Skip Navigation

How about we play, "Never have I ever"?

Here's the rules:

1: Post something you have never done that you think many people do. 2: Read the other posts, if you have done that thing, upvote it. If you have not done that thing, downvote it. 3: If you believe the person is lying, call them out on it in a reply. 4: If you are called out, give the full story. 4a: If you see a thread containing the full story, boost the person you think is right and truthful.

Person who has the most upvotes when the thread dies wins.

275

You're viewing a single thread.

275 comments
  • meta: I think you should invert the rules, so that if you have done it, you downvote. The winner with the most votes is then the rarest of them all

    • If you have done it you upvote. If you have not done it you downvote.

      The point is to be the person with the most upvotes because you've not done a thing that most people have done.

    • That's what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.

      Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.

      • I think you and I share the same mind, but different eyes.

        If someone says "I never shot a hippo", then right now I will down vote (because I haven't shot a hippo), so then if it gets upvoted.....

        OHhhhhh. It just clicked for me. Yep, you're right. It makes sense

      • Either my reading comprehension has been turned to dust or you didnt read it

        2: Read the other posts, if you have done that thing, upvote it.

        As in: Upvote, I have not done that thing

        Edit: Seems like I can't read. I think it's called double negation?

        • The problem is that the "thing" is either:

          • never have I ever done this <thing> or
          • <never have I ever done this thing>
275 comments