You're viewing a single thread.
I'm sure pretending the blue candidate isn't complicit in genocide is a great strategy to convincing more voters.
Unfortunately we are in the same position with both candidates. You can't be President of the US and have clean hands
True but the meme claims "spotless record" which is not true
I guess when both candidates have "Genocide Participant" credits it no longer matters to compared that specific item.
Say that back to yourself out loud, and see if it still sounds right.
What for? There are absolutely no real options to avoid the Israel/Palestine conflict. So as an adult who understands that there are some things I can and cannot influence I move on to those I can influence.
One candidate is leagues above the other.
Anyone who says "well your candidate will be bad for Israel/Palestine" is being disingenuous because both will suck. Thats bait and a distraction.
Going 3rd party or abstaining from voting are both stupid approaches.
I voted for Harris. Did you know there are ways to advocate for Harris without excusing the genocide?
Pretending the red candidate isn't a secret selling multi-count rapist Nazi has been working out just fine.
Tell me again, what are Jane Steins accomplishments?