The US having ambitions to fight China will never stop being hilarious.
The US having ambitions to fight China will never stop being hilarious.
good luck with that lol
You're viewing a single thread.
China simps want China to fight the US so badly to make them feel like big boys who took the big boy side.
Despite the fact that neither China nor the US want to fight.
It's funny, in a sad kind of way.
49 2 ReplyInvading the Falklands absolutely trashed Argentina's economy, and being offside with the UK continues to hurt them.
Attempting to invade Taiwan would utterly destroy the Chinese economy, and I think they're smart enough to know it.
19 0 ReplyAnd don't give them any benefits, TSMC most valuable asset is their employees not the machines, anyone can buy ASML machines, only TSMC employees can do it as good as they do
13 0 ReplyAFAIK China isn’t allowed to buy loads of fancy ASML machines, however TSMC has said they have procedures to destroy those machines if there’s ever an invasion
13 0 Replyanyone can buy ASML machines
I'd be very surprised if China was allowed to do this after invading Taiwan.
9 0 ReplyA yes of course, but I was talking more about how AMD, Intel, Nvidia, Apple, Samsung all have the best in the industry, but still no one can just buy ASML and make chips as good as TSMC
7 0 Reply
I also want China and USA to fight but that's because im a accelerationist and I want to get humanity to the next level.
(Its good for my stocks as well)
10 27 ReplyNCD leaking lmao
21 0 ReplyOops
11 0 Reply
Please no advocating for violence, even if you're joking.
though what's the next level?
13 0 ReplyNext level is us being replaced by robots because we can't live in a nuclear wasteland...
(No actually war or cold war drives up innovation through competition)
7 0 ReplyEconomic competition also drives innovation, but with less bloodshed.
8 0 ReplyBut its harder to predict which stocks go up...
2 0 Reply
Where's the fun in that?
4 0 Reply
Its good for my stocks as well
Are you invested solely in defense stocks?
6 0 ReplyBasically
3 1 Reply