Don’t Think of It as a Contest Between Biden and Trump
Don’t Think of It as a Contest Between Biden and Trump
What matters even more than the candidates is the coalitions they lead.
Personality certainly matters. But it might be more useful, in terms of the actual stakes of a contest, to think about the presidential election as a race between competing coalitions of Americans. Different groups, and different communities, who want very different — sometimes mutually incompatible — things for the country.
The coalition behind Joe Biden wants what Democratic coalitions have wanted since at least the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt: government assistance for working people, federal support for the inclusion of more marginal Americans.
As for the coalition behind Trump? Beyond the insatiable desire for lower taxes on the nation’s monied interests, there appears to be an even deeper desire for a politics of domination. Trump speaks less about policy, in any sense, than he does about getting revenge on his critics. He’s only concerned with the mechanisms of government to the extent that they are tools for punishing his enemies.
If you're an American, and you like what the Democratic coalition is after, then get involved, help with money if you can, and pay attention to downballot races too, not just the top.
You're viewing part of a thread.
We don’t always get that - that’s how we got a child tax credit for a few years.
Joe Manchin made sure it died. The only democrat whose vote actually matters doubled child poverty. Thank you for illustrating my point.
He did kill it — something like 48/50 Senate Democrats wanted to keep it, and every Republican wanted to get rid of it. That's a reason to elect more and better Democrats, not to reject them entirely.
So you're saying all the Republicans and just enough Democrats voted to double child poverty.
"All the Republicans and just enough Democrats" is the only actual coalition in DC.
Not always — when there are more and better Democrats we can actually change policy on this.
If we get more Democrats, We'll still have just enough Manchins. I remember the last time we had a supermajority.
That's why I talk about electing both more and better. They don't have to be Manchins; you can see this at the state level with the kinds of policy changes you get in places like Michigan when Democrats start to hold a supermajority.
They don’t have to be Manchins;
They don't? I'll let Jessica Cisneros know.
Who wins a primary is up to the voters.
Then the party didn't need to throw its weight behind Cuellar.
But it did because he's a Manchin type.