The total combat losses of the enemy from 02.24.22 to 01.20.24
The total combat losses of the enemy from 02.24.22 to 01.20.24
The total combat losses of the enemy from 02.24.22 to 01.20.24 approximately amounted to:
personnel - about 375,270 (+750) people,
tanks ‒ 6171 (+4) units,
armored combat vehicles ‒ 11,455 (+10) units,
artillery systems - 8868 (+14) units,
MLRS – 967 (+1) units,
air defense equipment ‒ 654 (+0) units,
aircraft – 331 (+0) units,
helicopters – 324 (+0) units,
UAVs of the operational-tactical level - 6934 (+5),
cruise missiles – 1818 (+0),
ships/boats ‒ 23 (+0) units,
submarines – 1 (+0) units,
automotive equipment and tank trucks – 11,848 (+17) units,
special equipment ‒ 1389 (+5)
The data is being verified.
Beat the occupier! Together we will win! Our strength is in the truth!
Source Ministry of Defense of Ukraine : https://www.mil.gov.ua/news/2024/01/20/ponad-375-tisyach-osib-bilshe-50-tisyach-odinicz-bojovoi-tehniki-–-zagalni-vtrati-rosii-vid-pochatku-shirokomasshtabnoi-vijni-proti-ukraini/
Translation with Google Translate.
You're viewing a single thread.
Thank you for these updates.
You are welcome.
I think it's nice to have the numbers back, although it's without the graphics.If you're looking for the graphic the general staff ZSU Facebook page still posts it. I'd post it myself but the numbers are usually posted while I'm asleep and someone else will probably beat me to it.
Thanks but I don't use facebook, twiiter and reddit. So I wouldn't know how to validate those are valid official numbers.
The numbers Wildflower and I have posted are with the official source, so anybody can validate they are true.
The image you posted is just an image with no source.
Also the numbers you show are not the current numbers, but from yesterday.Sorry about that! I posted the first one I scrolled to on their FB page as an example. The image is also posted in the official Telegram group as well. Hope that helps.
This page?
https://t.me/s/operativnoZSU
I can't see it. Only a graphic with only Ukrainian text.Thanks, but that requires an app, so not great for easy validation by everybody either.
Verifiable information is better than pretty graphics IMO. There's a reason we always link an easy verifiable official source.