In a televised address to the French on Wednesday, the French president described Russia as a 'threat to France and Europe,' and said he wanted to confer with European allies on using France's nuclear deterrent to protect Europe.
Just having one would be more dangerous then having none. It's not enough for actual deterrence but it is enough for Russia to "justify" using its arsenal against them.
@UnderpantsWeevil@Not_mikey This is in no way the same, we finally reached the end of the cold war. Now it is upon the rest of the world to decide what we do with the two who projected that misery on the entire world. Hindering development and forcing countries to choose sides.
That order doesn't make sense, does it? It should be Castro=Zelensky, Khrushchev=Macron, and Kennedy=Putin ... but even then, it would only really make sense in the context of a prior action by Putin stationing missiles in points at map randomly Belarus. Maybe I am overthinking it, but I think the Cuban Missile Crisis was a different situation, especially as it additionally also occurred during a cold war.