Russia rearming faster than thought ‘for possible attack on Nato’
Russia rearming faster than thought ‘for possible attack on Nato’
Vladimir Putin is ‘clearly creating the conditions’ for an assault, says German army chief
![Russia rearming faster than thought ‘for possible attack on Nato’](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/world-news/2025/01/19/TELEMMGLPICT000408299811_17373169168380_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqtR1WRZ4lb6BOb1-FBRpn-lFGGjcI28awSNtOPAVs6pc.jpeg?impolicy=OG-Standard&format=webp&thumbnail=256)
Summary
Germany warns that Russia is rearming faster than expected, replacing war losses and stockpiling tanks, missiles, and drones.
Putin has redirected Russia’s economy to fuel its military, aided by supplies from Iran and North Korea.
While there’s no clear evidence of plans to attack NATO, Russia is creating the conditions for it.
On the Ukraine front, Russian forces are advancing in south Donetsk, nearing strategic town Pokrovsk, a key supply hub and coal mining center.
Analysts suggest Putin aims to seize land before potential peace talks.
You're viewing part of a thread.
No it means I'm confident of it's certainty, you just read the fuckin definition. What exactly is confusing you.
4 0 ReplyThat's not what "Yes" means. Why are you so confused about such a basic English word?
1 6 Replyused to give an affirmative response.
Correct, I am certain NATO would respond. You're confused bud, I couldn't be more clear.
3 0 ReplyYeah, again, please lend me your crystal ball.
1 6 ReplyI'll start with a dictionary while you try for a clue.
3 0 ReplyYeah that's very likely to help you figure out where you went wrong.
See how I didn't say it was definitely going to help? Because even though most people are capable of figuring out such a mistake, I can't see into the future?
1 6 ReplyAt least be original if you can't be right.
2 0 Reply