Why is the word "defense" avoided in reporting and rhetorics around Ukraine?
Why is the word "defense" avoided in reporting and rhetorics around Ukraine?
I think that would be not only appropriate but also helpful to frame Ukraine as "defending their land" instead of "being at war". So why dont politicians and journalists primarily use this word?
You're viewing a single thread.
For the same reason the media bastards avoid it for Israel, they get money from questionable people and click bait that only works with rage and appealing to the braindead morons that read the shit.
Israel: The best defense is a good genocide
Gtfoh all I hear is how "Israel has a right to defend itself" in defense of every war crime charge.
Israel is defending themselves so hard, they're throwing Israeli soldiers over the Palestinian border to abuse and murder civilians, fuckin righteous
Palestinian border
The what?
Yeah... Ukraine is also entering "Russia's" territory and "abuses" "civilians" by killing Russian soldiers.
Soldiers are not civilians, and Russian state media are the only ones who report that Ukrainians have invaded the Russian border. Try again
No shit Sherlock. That might just be the point...